If the bank refuses to finance your SME's expansion, start by asking for the exact reason. For a profitable SME, it usually fits in one sentence: equity is too low for the debt requested. That reason dictates the exit: phase the project, bring in equity, add a subordinated loan or obtain a regional guarantee.
I wrote refusals of this kind for eight years, in the business lending department of a bank in Namur, between 2009 and 2017. The project was rarely the problem. The balance sheet almost always was. Here is the way through, in order.
Why does the bank say no?
Four reasons come up. Each one calls for a different exit, which is why the first step is knowing which applies to you.
| Reason given by the bank | What it means | Suitable exits |
|---|---|---|
| Insufficient equity | The balance sheet cannot carry that much debt | Equity, subordinated loan |
| Repayment capacity too tight | Cash flows do not cover instalments with a margin | Phasing, longer term, quasi-equity with deferred repayment |
| Insufficient collateral | The project does not offer enough security | Regional guarantee, equity injection |
| Project seen as too risky | New market, new technology | Equity, an investor who shares the risk |
An edge case I have seen several times in industrial SMEs: a new production hall, 100% loan-financed, on a balance sheet whose equity had been drained by dividends in previous years. Sound project, profitable company, refused all the same. The debt requested exceeded what the balance sheet could carry.
What are the options without the bank?
None of the four exits really does without the bank. They complement it, so that it agrees to finance the rest.
| Exit | Cost | Dilution | Timeline | When to choose it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale down or phase the project | Low | None | Immediate | The project can be split without losing its logic |
| Equity (a fund takes a stake) | High over time | Yes | Several months | Structuring project, you want a partner |
| Subordinated loan | Intermediate | None | A few weeks to a few months | Positive EBITDA, no wish to open the capital |
| Regional guarantee | Guarantee fee | None | Depends on the body | The refusal is mainly about collateral |
The steps, in order
- Get the reason in writing. Ask your relationship manager what is missing for the project to be financed, and what contribution the bank expects. There is no legal equity ratio: each bank sets its own.
- Test whether the project can be split. A production line can sometimes be installed in two stages, a building put up in phases. The bank finances phase one, and phase two builds on its results. It costs nothing, but it delays the project and does not work when the investment is indivisible.
- If the reason is equity, choose between shares and a subordinated loan. A fund taking a minority stake strengthens the balance sheet. Invest.BW, the Walloon Brabant regional investment company, states on its partnership page that its contribution is shared with other investors or with the bank. The price: a share of your capital and a say in certain decisions. A subordinated loan does not dilute. Repaid after the bank, it counts as quasi-equity in the bank's analysis. Sambrinvest presents its subordinated loans as leverage with bankers, and ORSA publishes a subordinated loan of €500,000 to €2.5M with part of the return linked to EBITDA (checked 15.10.2026). Namur Invest goes down to €100,000. The details are in the subordinated loan.
- If the reason is collateral, ask for a guarantee. In Wallonia, Wallonie Entreprendre offers guarantees (it is the Walloon Region's public financing arm) that cover part of the bank's risk. In Brussels, finance&invest.brussels publishes guarantees too. In Flanders, the public body is PMV. A guarantee does not strengthen equity: it is not enough if the refusal is about leverage.
- Get an agreement in principle from the additional funder. A fund's letter of intent, a subordinated loan offer or a guarantee approval: that document is what unlocks the bank.
- Have the bank approve the package before signing. Especially the subordination clause, which must be worded so that the bank restates it as quasi-equity.
How do you go back to the bank with a fund?
With a complete file, not a promise. A file that arrives with its funding round already closed often changes the answer, at the same bank.
In practice, your new file contains:
- the reason for the first refusal and how you address it;
- the agreement in principle from the fund, the subordinated lender or the guarantee body;
- the revised financing plan, with each funder's share;
- a repayment plan stress-tested with a six-month delay and a drop in margin.
On the bank side, I saw files refused in March go through in June without a single line of the project changing. Only the pro forma balance sheet had changed.
One last piece of advice, from the other side of the desk. Do not present the additional funder as a plan B. Present it as the answer to the reason the bank gave you. Your relationship manager has to defend your file before a credit committee that has never met you. The more closely your file answers the written objection, point by point, the easier that defence becomes.
To compare a bank loan and equity on a worked €3M example, see bank debt or equity. To find out who offers what, with ticket and area, the ranking of investment funds for SMEs covers nine players. The final choice depends on your accounts: have the package reviewed by your accountant.
Comparator
Compare investment funds side by side.
Compare now →
Frequently asked questions
From 2009 to 2017, Cédric spent eight years in the corporate lending department of a Belgian bank in Namur, on the side that turns files down and writes the covenants. He then became financial controller at an industrial SME in Hainaut just as a provincial invest took a stake in its capital. Based in Gembloux, he rereads the terms published by Walloon and Brussels funds and invests every month.